<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Scientific consensus?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.helsinki.fi/egru-blog/2008/12/30/scientific-consensus/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.helsinki.fi/egru-blog/2008/12/30/scientific-consensus/</link>
	<description>News &#38; Views on Ecology, Evolution &#38; Genetics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Mar 2013 08:33:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Juha</title>
		<link>http://blogs.helsinki.fi/egru-blog/2008/12/30/scientific-consensus/#comment-203</link>
		<dc:creator>Juha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 06:17:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.helsinki.fi/egru-blog/2008/12/30/scientific-consensus/#comment-203</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I love the line &quot;One certainly hears of incidents within national fisheries research agencies, where certain results are not welcome if they contradict government positions.&quot;

Would it work equally well by replacing &quot;national fisheries research agencies&quot; with &quot;scientific community&quot; and &quot;government&quot; with IIASA?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I love the line &#8220;One certainly hears of incidents within national fisheries research agencies, where certain results are not welcome if they contradict government positions.&#8221;</p>
<p>Would it work equally well by replacing &#8220;national fisheries research agencies&#8221; with &#8220;scientific community&#8221; and &#8220;government&#8221; with IIASA?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob O'Hara</title>
		<link>http://blogs.helsinki.fi/egru-blog/2008/12/30/scientific-consensus/#comment-202</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob O'Hara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 06:09:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.helsinki.fi/egru-blog/2008/12/30/scientific-consensus/#comment-202</guid>
		<description>I wouldn&#039;t see IIASA as being neutral in this debate, really.  I guess it&#039;s a puff-piece for one of their employees (and someone I co-authored a TREE article with, once).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t see IIASA as being neutral in this debate, really.  I guess it&#8217;s a puff-piece for one of their employees (and someone I co-authored a TREE article with, once).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
