Data workshop online sessions, 1 October 2020 – 11 March 2021

Unfortunately our reported speech workshop planned for March 2020 had to be cancelled earlier this year, but thanks to the contribution of many colleagues we will have a great alternative between October 2020 and February 2021: online data sessions. Depending on the preference of the presenter, these sessions can take a traditional presentation format or consist of more improvised data sharing, but we will always leave plenty of opportunity for discussion and collaborative data exploration.

Starting on the 1st of October we will have bi-weekly Zoom meetings between 2-4pm Central European time. (Note: 3-5pm in Helsinki!) Because of a change from Summer to Winter time around the end of October this will mean 2pm-4pm CEST (GMT + 2) for the first two sessions and 2pm-4pm CET (GMT + 1) for the remaining sessions.

Programme

Workshop description

Reported speech is a grammatical phenomenon that allows a speaker to represent an utterance and attribute it to another speaker, or to herself at an earlier moment in time. Reported speech is discussed widely in the typological literature (Buchstaller & Alphen 2012; Güldemann & Roncador 2002;
Janssen & Wurff 1996; Spronck & Nikitina 2019 inter alia). Most commonly, it takes a form as in (1), with a clausal element signalling a speech event and a reported speaker, followed by a clausal element representing an attributed locution, or as in (2), with these same elements in reverse order.

(1) Peter says: “The weather is nice.”

(2) Solega (India; Dravidian)
“o: oḷḷe sakuna no:ḍ-i buddi” avã he:ḷ-in-ã
INTJ good omen look-IMP lord 3SG.M say-PST-3SG.M
“Oh, it’s a good omen! Look, my lord!” he said (Si & Spronck 2019: 283)

Between the clausal elements various linking elements may appear and degrees of syntactic integration (traditionally represented as the distinction between ‘direct’ vs. ‘indirect’ speech). In addition to expressing utterances, the structures used in reported speech are also frequently found to express non-illocutionary meanings, such as thought (as in 3), intent (as in 4 and 5), causation or aspectual meanings, among others. These ‘extended’ meanings of reported speech occur with a
noticeable crosslinguistic frequency and regularity (Spronck & Nikitina 2019: 140-142, and references therein).

(3) Tommo So (Mali; Dogon)
yɛ́llɛ̀ g-àà=sɛ́-m.
come.IMPF say-PFV=have-1SG
‘I think that he’s coming’ (McPherson 2013: 454)

(4) Kalam (Papua New Guinea; Madang)
“laplap d-in!” ag nŋ-i, ktg ow-a-k
clothes take-1SG.HORT say think-SS.PRIOR leave come-3SG-PAST
‘She wanted to take (steal) clothes (but) left (them) behind.’ (lit.: ‘“Let me take clothes!” say, having thought, leaving she came.’) (Pawley & Bulmer 2011: 64)

(5) Maale (Ethiopia; North Omotic)
gém-átsí maatt-ó múʔ-á-ne geʔ-í mágg-ó ʔááɗ-é-ne
ox-M:NOM grass-ABS eat-IPF-A:DCL say-CNV1 cliff-ABS go-IPF-A:DCL
‘The ox fell off the cliff when it was trying to eat the grass’ (Amha 2001: 149)

As the literal translations of (3-5) illustrate, in each of these cases a clausal element with a verb glossed as ‘say’ signals a meaning that does not reflect an attributed locution.

In this workshop we explore the range of meanings and structures in expressions of reported speech, with a specific focus on non-illocutionary meanings, i.e. examples of reported speech where no attributed utterance is suggested. The workshop consists of data sessions of 30-60 minutes each.

References

Amha, A. 2001. The Maale Language. (CNWS Publications, 99.) Leiden: Research School of Asian, African and Amerindian Studies, University of Leiden.

Buchstaller, I. & I. van Alphen (eds). 2012. Quotatives: Cross-linguistic and cross-disciplinary perspectives. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Güldemann, T. & M. von Roncador (eds). 2002. Reported Discourse: A meeting ground for different linguistic domains. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Janssen, T. & W. van der Wurff (eds). 1996. Reported Speech: Forms and functions of the verb. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

McPherson, L. 2013. A grammar of Tommo So. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.

Pawley, A. & Bulmer, R. 2011. A Dictionary of Kalam with Ethnographic Notes. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.

Reesink, G. P. 1993. Inner speech in Papuan languages. Language and Linguistics in Melanesia 24. 217–225.

Si, A. & S. Spronck. 2019. Solega defenestration: Underspecified perspective shift in an unwritten Dravidian language. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 29(2). 277–301.

Spronck, S. & T. Nikitina. 2019. Reported speech forms a dedicated syntactic domain. Linguistic Typology 23(1): 119–159.