How and why I self-archive – four researchers report their views

Many reasons are given for self-archiving, and self-archivers follow many different practices. We asked four researchers from different disciplines how and why they self-archive their research results. We also asked the researchers about their views on the promotion of self-archiving. This is the seventh part of the Think Open blog’s article series on self-archiving.

Jatka lukemista ”How and why I self-archive – four researchers report their views”

Open science in my PhD

”Science should be transparent and accessible to everyone. Today, I firmly believe that science goes hand in hand with openness. When I started my PhD couple of years ago, I did not even know what open science meant. Since then, I have taken baby steps towards a more sustainable science culture.” In this blog post, University of Helsinki doctoral student Julia Kemppinen writes on a practical level how she learned to understand the importance of open science and how she implements open science practices in her research.

Jatka lukemista ”Open science in my PhD”

Two-point checklist about self-archiving for University of Helsinki researchers

Does self-archiving of research articles seem difficult or laborious? It’s not. Basically, there is only two things you need to remember about self-archiving at the University of Helsinki (if you want to choose the easiest way). This is the sixth part of Think Open blog’s article series on self-archiving.

Jatka lukemista ”Two-point checklist about self-archiving for University of Helsinki researchers”

Support for self-archiving from the library

Helsinki University Library supports self-archiving and open access publishing with its services: information service, training sessions, reminders about self-archiving, TUHAT checking and self-archiving depositing service. This article presents self-archiving and the work and services of the library’s open access team. This is the fourth part of Think Open blog’s article series on self-archiving.

Jatka lukemista ”Support for self-archiving from the library”

Julkaisuarkistot käyttäjäkokemuksen jäljillä – Open Repositories 2019 -konferenssi Hampurissa

Avoimiin julkaisuarkistoihin keskittyvä Open Repositories -konferenssi järjestettiin kesäkuussa Hampurissa. Tämän vuoden teemana oli käyttäjän tarpeet. Neljän päivän aikana syvennyttiin myös muun muassa avoimeen tieteeseen, julkaisuarkistojen kehittämiseen, metadataan ja laki- ja lisensointiasioihin. Tietojärjestelmäasiantuntija Reeta Kuuskoski ja tietoasiantuntija Tanja Vienonen Kansalliskirjastosta käyvät läpi konferenssin antia ja taustoittavat myös suomalaisten julkaisuarkistojen roolia.

Jatka lukemista ”Julkaisuarkistot käyttäjäkokemuksen jäljillä – Open Repositories 2019 -konferenssi Hampurissa”

Better visibility, more impact – and six other advantages of self-archiving

Self-archiving has many kinds of advantages, such as being free of charge and increasing visibility and effectiveness. This article briefly describes the most important advantages of self-archiving. This is the fourth part of Think Open blog’s article series on self-archiving.  [This article was updated in December 8, 2021.]

Jatka lukemista ”Better visibility, more impact – and six other advantages of self-archiving”

Four small steps – how to publish your paper openly in Helda repository

Many researchers would like to publish their articles openly in the University of Helsinki’s digital repository Helda, but don’t know how it happens. No fear, it is not difficult at all! In this blog text we will show you in plain language how everybody can self-archive their articles (publisher’s policies permitting) in few minutes. This is the third part of Think Open blog’s article series on self-archiving. [Updated 28.11.2021]

Jatka lukemista ”Four small steps – how to publish your paper openly in Helda repository”

Which version of the article can I submit to the digital repository?

Roughly 80 % of publishers allow self-archiving of some version of the article in open repositories and the most common version allowed is the accepted manuscript (post-print). For this reason, it is most important to keep a copy of the final manuscript which includes the modifications from peer review. The second part of the Think Open blog’s self-archiving series deals with the article versions.

Jatka lukemista ”Which version of the article can I submit to the digital repository?”