“Not everyone needs to become Steve Jobs”

Start ups have made their way from garages to the talks of ministres. Finland craves for a new Nokia or for whatever innovations to patch up floundering exports and the gradual rundown of several industries. So far start-ups have been built up in the hands of people from business or technical backgrounds. Aalto University’s Aalto Venture Garage Start up-hub has been nominated the official lifesaver of the country. Is there anything out there for social scientist and humanists?

Codrin Kruijne thinks there is. “Not everyone needs to become Steve Jobs”, he starts. Kruijne guides and teaches students at the Utrecht Center for Entrepreneurship in the Netherlands. UCE’s one year-lasting program aims at making students of social sciences and humanities aware of entrepreneurship as a career option and preparing them for it. A humanist may stop reading here, but in the UCE being an entrepreneur means something else than working long hours in the hope of getting filthy rich. “We don’t want to create these mythical entrepreneurs but to stimulate entrepreneurial behavior”, Kruijne tells. In UCE the vision is, that an entrepreneur with an academic background can make a difference in society with novel applications of his disciplinary (scientific) knowledge. UCE students have founded eg. Brood Funds, a new community based insurance system for unemployed people.

So UCE sees entrepreneurship from a new angle, which however doesn’t mean you could avoid courses on accounting or marketing while studying there. That is because no matter how non-profit your enterprise is, the bills and wages still need to be paid. This is what many idealists forget when talking about money feels uncomfortable. Again, marketing is often mixed with mere advertising, although it should be seen as the process of getting to know your customer. It is the “interaction between what you want to do and what you customer needs”, as Codrin Kruijne puts it.

The University of Utrecht resembles the University of Helsinki in the sense that neither of them have faculties for business or technology. UCE gets students from eg. psychology, history, biomedicine an political science. Codrin Kruijne thinks that the strengths of academic entrepreneurs are especially abstract thinking and understanding of complex systems. In addition academic entrepreneurs are familiar with the scientific method where you don’t just make a ready “business plan”, but where the plan is being remodeled after hypotheses have been tested and experimented. Kruijne underlines, that experimenting is crucially important for a starting entrepreneur, simply because you cannot know in advance, what is going to work and what is not. “Usually we love our own idea so much, that we are not ready to accept any information that is against it. That is why the most important experiment to do is the one that proves you wrong”, Kruijne ends.

Entrepreneurial stereotypes and humanistic entrepreneurs

On our trip we discussed the stereotypes and beliefs surrounding entrepreneurship. The most common cliché is that entrepreneurs are hardworking loners, introverted inventors and risk takers that are on the edge of loosing everything if their business idea fails. Also the media tends to promote stories of these risk takers who without much education turned a crazy idea into a million dollar business. These types are easy to criticize and knock over, but stereotypes can also tell us the general conception and image that might stop people from considering to start up a business. Keeping the dreaded risks in mind, I have also pondered what kind of equation humanities and entrepreneurship can create. Could these stereotypical challenges be won over by the skills that humanities can create? Would it be possible to translate the knowledge I have into creating a business?

From this to action?

During the trip it became clear that entrepreneurial work is one way to employment among others. It’s an independent, responsible and creative path to turn your own interests, knowledge and visions into a source of livelihood instead of working for someone. As a student of arts and humanities I’ve come across the mentioned stereotypes- even prejudices, since traditionally most entrepreneurs work outside this field. To generalize from the large scale of humanistic approaches, our skills are for example critical thinking, cultural knowledge, intercultural and communication skills. From this viewpoint networking and cultural understanding can be for example used to create social and economic value. The problem here could be that our studies don’t always support the process to determine what our expertize is. When wanting to change something, putting together the values and ideas of humanities with the skill set of entrepreneurship one can create problem solving strategies needed in the future. Entrepreneurs look at the outside world searching for ways to clinch these problems.

It’s also important to team up! If you come up with an idea you want to carry on with, students from such back rounds should be more active in connecting with people with the necessary skills they are possibly lacking. Multidisciplinary synergy and for example extra knowledge on how to run a business is easily accessible. Maybe we will see interdisciplinary programs for future entrepreneurs at Universities in the future?

Farmers of the better future

Anke de Vrieze in the Farming the City office.

We visited the office of Farming The City, which is a pilot project that has gathered different urban farming projects of Amsterdam together in an internet platform designed to provide an opportunity to discuss, debate and spread information about urban farming. Anke de Vrieze who is in working as a interview manager and project assistance, gave us a brief introduction to urban farming world of Netherlands. She told us that they have 20 projects that they choose to present in their webpage. Their goal was to introduce a “local food system”, a place-based, self-reliant food production system that would use available information about land ownership and use, planning policies and urban design initiatives.

The project has existed since 2010 and includes rooftop gardening, farming in empty buildings, school projects and various other innovative projects. Most of the projects are fully powered by small volunteer groups, but at least one business was established by an young entrepreneur who simply delivers food from organic food shops to customers by bicycle. The whole Farming the City -project left an impression that a lot of people are interested in urban farming in Netherlands, many small groups are active, but there is still a lot of work to get urban farming easily accessible for the general public. In Finland we are lagging behind a bit, but I believe that urban farming is a rising trend in the future, as it is already.

Maybe we could learn from the Netherlands that there is room for many players in the field, and that if one has an idea, they should definitely share it to other people with the same interests, and just get their hands dirty!

Humanities and Social Sciences – Suitable for Business?

One of the most intriguing visits for me during the trip was with Suitable for Business. A Copenhagen based collective of students or a movement as they like to call themselves, Suitable for Business searches for novel ways to bring business and humanities together. Started in 2011 by philosophy students, SfB found home at the Copenhagen Business School.

Founding member and chairman of SfB, an enthusiastic yet calm and collected Matias Sondergaard took us through the basic premises of the movement. “We want to find ways to use our humanistic view of the world to benefit businesses. Academic skills from outside the economics can and should be used in improving the world of business.”

According to the SfB Manifesto or the ten commandments of the movement, humanistic businesses are ones that “are built upon morality, empathy and a link to culture. Moreover they aspire for creative solutions”. The more we chatted, the more I realized Torstai and SfB have in common. I for one definitely subscribe to Matias’s view, that society at large can only benefit from those shared values created through humanities and social sciences entering the world of business. Instead of battling business, as has traditionally been the case for students from the aforementioned disciplines, why not find ways to incorporate  values and ideas created through them into business life and change it for the better?

What SfB does in practice is organize an annual conference and case competition. At the conference lectures and speeches are given by representatives from both businesses and the academia. The case competition brings together multidisciplinary teams of students to work on a specific case in which their individual skills and knowledge can be combined in a group effort. The first case competition in 2011 was organized in collaboration with the Danish Red Cross. You can learn more about the competition and the way SfB works at www.suitableforbusiness.dk/#Home

Walking away from the meeting I was left with a strengthened feeling that what I’m doing with Torstai can find resonance and sympathies among a wider audience of students that I had ever imagined. I was also super inspired to develop the way we work and start to think about the open road of possibilities ahead for our co-operative.

Mika Hyötyläinen, Torstai Helsinki

 

Great restaurant tip for Copenhagen

As you can probably tell, we had a pretty amazing trip. Near the end, we also had one amazing dinner at Manfred’s & Vin in Copenhagen.

We had pre-ordered the menu so nobody had to make a decisions which was perfect for a big group. The food was unbelievable! There were a lot of vegetarians in the group and we were pleased that the best bites were the vegetarian dishes.

Listen to others – decide on your own

Tieteestä toimintaa –trip blew my mind in many ways. I loved the inspiring atmosphere of Kennisland office in Amsterdam and the great Future Navigators -workshop by Liselotte Lyngsø in Copenhagen – just to mention few highlights along the way.

Here are my three key insights from the trip.

1. Listen louder

I realized that the key for successful entrepreneurship is openness. Ask questions, talk about your idea widely and especially listen to people´s advice and needs carefully.

2. There are no right answers

Listening is essential, but I also understood that my partners and I have to make the final decisions on our own. There are only opinions but not right answers to many questions. Realizing that feels first scary, but after a while it starts to feel actually empowering…

3. Work hard and be nice to people

Setting up a business is hard work. I had only 45 minutes spare time in Copenhagen during the week. Within those precious minutes I ran into the Urban Outfitters -store and found a funny little aphorism book. My absolutely favourite was: ”Work hard and be nice to people”. I think that is a great motto for new (and also an older) entrepreneur.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Maria Ruuska

Maria Ruuska and two of her journalist collegues are interested in using the tools of feature journalism in research and reporting context. They want to run a business offering traditional feature articles, little ethnographic studies, reporting and consulting. The center of everything is catchy and elegant writing.

Entrepreneurship can be Anarchy

It was three weeks ago when my friend Maria called me and suggested that I should apply for Tieteestä toimintaa trip to Copenhagen and Amsterdam. I had pretty much no idea what the trip was all about. I hesitated for an hour or so and then decided to go. I’m really glad I did beacause the trip gave me a good reminder about the importance of anarchy in life.

 

Entrepreneurship has been on my mind for years. I found a Facebook update from 2008 where I had written that I have a business idea and I’m going to hire all my student friends. I have no idea what the idea was, but I remember being excited. To me entrepreneurship is a chance of doing something great and something different. Great things for yourself and for others.

 

I will be a sociologist in the near future and I feel passionate about social research and sociological theories. I don’t want to be a researcher in the academia, but I most definetly want to keep working on sociology. Someone told me once that sociology is the punk music of social sciences. I couldn’t agree more. It has great potential for finding anarchist solutions for everyday life. Starting up a business can also be anarchist. It’s all about finding your own way of doing things. What a great combo.

 

So before the trip i had a vague idea about making a business out of innovative sociological research. During the trip I realized that I have to find an anarchist niche to start with. Something new and something great. That shouldn’t be too hard because I have all the magical (I’m serious!) tools from my academic background in sociology. The trip gave me exactly what I needed: inspiration for using my own inspiration. That is my kind of anarchy.

Anyone can pitch for the New York Times

Perhaps one of the biggest fears for an entrepreneur is that of the actual moment when you are going to have to present your idea in front of your shareholders. Whether you are the CEO of an environmental start-up or a freelance journalist approaching a newspaper editor, selling your idea and yourself could seem tricky or simply uncomfortable. I know that, at least in my case, talking about my idea – no matter how much I believe in it – and convincing someone that it is wonderful and worth investing in, make me cringe. “Why would anybody take me seriously at this age?” or “What if they think my idea is crap?” are just two of the many questions storming through my mind as I contemplate the idea of writing a pitch.

To overcome this fear – or at least to begin to rationalize it – I invited my dear friend James to Amsterdam to hold a workshop about the art and science of writing a pitch. James writes as a freelancer for the New York Times, CNN and BBC and has a lot of experience in selling his work to some of the most demanding editors in the world. As result of his background, the session focused on the theme of pitching a story but the things we learnt can be extrapolated to the business world as well.

The two hour session began with James telling us about what it means to be a journalist in today’s ever-changing media landscape. Like with the entrepreneurial world, the sphere of journalism seems to need an infusion of a new type of capital. As readers’ numbers plummet and magazines shut down, journalists must learn to be more entrepreneurial. One of the ways in which you can do this is by diversifying your expertise.

“It is really important to be a specialist in a particular area – Middle Eastern football and politics, for instance – but, at the same time, I believe a journalist should be able to work with several types of media and be ready to edit photos and video or make a radio recording” says James to 6 pairs of very curious eyes

.

The second part of the session continued with practical exercises in how to write a pitch and who to send it to. Here are some of the basics:

  1. A pitch should be no longer than three paragraphs.
  2. The first paragraph should be exactly how you would imagine your actual article to begin.
  3. The second paragraph should give more details about the subject and its background as well as what makes you valuable as a reporter.
  4. Don’t send more than one or two pitches at once as editors don’t have the time to read everything.

But to me, the most interesting intake from the meeting was the discovery that anybody can pitch to big publications. I think James exemplified perfectly how simply having the right structure and courageous attitude can help you see your own name in the New York Times.

To there and back again

The trip is about to begin.

It’s been five days since we came back from our journey. So what did I learn from this trip and how did our idea develop?

Most of the ideas of the group were more or less unclear when leaving Finland, but after a week of hard work they had progressed a lot. Our idea Yhteismaa progressed too, but since we have been planning it since last spring and we have actually already produced something together, our situation was a bit different. At the same time with the trip there were already things going on in Finland.

It’s hard to say, which the most important influences from the trip are, but there were a lot of them. The visit to Design Thinkers clearly showed the whole group, what we really have to take into account and what our ideas essentially are all about.

During the trip I also noticed, that we have to simplify the idea as much as possible and tell who we are and show concrete examples of what we are doing. Yhteismaa is something quite unique and our working field is pretty wide, and that’s why it is a bit hard to put shortly, what we are all about.

That’s what our idea is all about

Many visits and conversations with others also helped with the main problem of our group: funding. How to get it and where to get it is the question we all are facing (as well as how to use it). There are still no clear answers to it, but at the moment our situation seems to be going to a better direction.

In addition I got many good ideas how to develop our idea further, as well as many good tips how to realize them in a better way. And one should not forget the connections made along the trip. For example Kennisland in Amsterdam has just started a project, which has a lot of similarities with our Nappi Naapuri project. A good change for international co-operation!

 

City hippie dreams

Finally, after quite a bit of cultivation our business idea starts to take its final shape! Me and my fiancé have been busy finding relevant information about the state and future of urban agriculture in Finland, tackling possible problems and mapping our contacts and possibilities and now our ”home-grown enterprise” is finally ready to be taken to the next level!

Our business aims to promote urban agriculture – a growing interest among private people and policymakers alike – by providing an easy access to planting boxes and other gardening essentials to our customers. We also provide information about starting up a garden, and how to make the most of it! We also offer the services of an urban agriculture expert who can really give people all the information they need. Our web page will have clear how-to instructions for those who wish to find the information themselves. We aim our services mainly to private people and housing companies, but will also aim to cooperate with the public sector and other communities.

Urban gardening saves emissions on food transportation, makes the urban environment more enjoyable and healthy, creates a sense of community among the people doing gardening in the same courtyard and is a great way to show children, and even adults, how their food is grown and produced. Our margeting targets families with children, elderly people and young green-minded urban dwellers – those who have the time and interest to do urban gardening.

Main channel for customers to take contact will be our internet page and social media. We will have an online form our customers can fill in and choose their preferred planting box and other services, such as soil, nutrients and plants/seeds. Then the customers will fill in their contact information and we will take care of the rest, including negotiating with the housing company and transportation of boxes to and from the customer. This solves a big problem with urban gardening today: when gardening is done in public areas, people have to travel a long way to get to their plantations, limiting their attractiveness and use for those who don’t have the capability to commute. It is also attractive that the gardens are brought close to the customers. Some urban gardening projects have also experienced theft and vandalism, which will be prevented by bringing the gardens to courtyards. Apart from the online form, we will also have a possibility to make orders or enquiries by telephone.