Research plan, ethics of mass media.

I don’t have any ready topic for my thesis and I hope our seminar will help me to develop it. Anyway I’m thinking to conduct my research in the field of applied ethics, particularly I would like to focus on ethical aspects of mass media, such as journalism, broadcasting, and the most interesting for me – advertising, public relations and new social media. Now I’m on stage of finding philosophically adequate way to study this problematics.

Doing a research in the field of applied ethics implies, on the one hand, looking at the issue from the perspective of general moral standards and values. In the case of ethics of mass media these means questioning about freedom, responsibility, truth and honesty, privacy etc. On the other hand, it requires an attempt of studying these general moral standards as an ethical basis of particular institutions and structures in society.

I see as an important goal of my project an attempt to look at ethics of mass media through social, political, economic and aesthetic perspectives and to find what are universal values in communication as a field of human activity and to analyze their outcomes in specific situations.

My interest is inspired by Clifford Christians’s research in the field of communication ethics, as well as on Manuel Castells and Niklas Luhmann philosophy of communication, and partly by post-structuralist philosophical tradition.

 

 

 

3 thoughts on “Research plan, ethics of mass media.

  1. I would you recommend works of Luciano Floridi on philosophy of information. As far as I know he is the leading scholar in this field.

  2. Here’s one book from the English language tradition dealing with ethics of media: ‘Mixed Media: Moral Distinctions in Advertising, Public Relations, and Journalism’; Bivins T. (ed.) 2003. Routledge.

  3. Inga, Castells and Luhmann are sociologists…
    Do you take mass media as a specific institution, or informational interaction as a process? In modern world it is hard to distinguish professional journalists from bloggers or “twitterers” or “facebookers”. People just upload their phone videos to YouTube (as it was in Libya for example) – and we get majority of information from the witnesses, not from news agencies. WikiLeaks were founded and still maintained by hackers, not journalists.
    I think it is possible to consider informational interaction as a process, without obsolete frameworks.
    Decline of printed newspapers is good evidence, I think.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *