Category Archives: seismology

When the Earth Spins: Unraveling the Importance of Ground Rotational Motion in Seismology and Engineering

When we think of earthquakes, the first thing that comes to mind is the shaking of the ground. However, there’s more to this movement than just the back-and-forth or up-and-down motion. Ground rotational motion, the twisting and tilting of the Earth’s surface locally, plays a crucial role in understanding and preparing for seismic events.

Daily Life Examples of Rotational Motion

To make the concept of rotational motion more relatable, let’s look at some everyday examples:

  1. Spinning Top: Just like a spinning top that wobbles as it slows down, the ground can twist and turn during an earthquake.
  2. Dizzy Dance Moves: Ever tried spinning around in circles for fun? The dizzy feeling you get is a small-scale version of what happens during rotational ground motion, minus the risk of knocking over a building.

Everyday examples of the rotational motion.

These everyday activities help us visualize how the ground might move during an earthquake. Now, let’s delve deeper into what ground rotational motion is and why it’s important.

Breaking Down Ground Motion: Translation, Rotation, and the Dance of the Earth

Ground rotational motion refers to the local rotation of the ground around about the vertical and horizontal axes (we nerds call them torsion and tilt or rocking motions!). Dream about standing on a giant turntable that starts to spin; you would experience rotational motion. Similarly, during an earthquake, different parts of the ground can move in circular or twisting patterns.

Assume that you’re standing in an open field during an earthquake. Now, let’s break down what happens to the ground beneath you:

  • Translation Motion:

Imagine someone gives you a gentle push from the north. You’ll feel yourself moving southward. This movement, where the ground shifts back and forth in one direction, is translation motion. It’s like someone gently nudging you in a straight line. Similarly, another person can give you a gentle push from the east that makes you feel yourself moving westward.

  • Rotation Motion:

Now, let’s say another person starts spinning you around in a circle while you’re still being pushed from the north and east. You’re not just moving south and west anymore; you’re also spinning around. This spinning motion, where the ground twists and turns, is rotation motion. It’s like being on a spinning merry-go-round while still feeling the push from the north and east.

How do you like it so far? Doesn’t it feel like that you are in an amusement park? You already have a couple of friends pushing and spinning you in different directions. So, it doesn’t hurt to have another pushing friend! Now, let’s add another dimension:

  • Up-and-Down Motion:

While all this is happening, imagine someone else starts lifting you up and down. So not only are you being pushed south, spun around, but you’re also bobbing up and down. This up-and-down motion completes the trio of translational motions, adding depth to the movement.

So, in summary, during an earthquake, the ground can move in six different ways simultaneously: it can shift back and forth, left and right, and rise and fall (up-and-down). These three motions are called translational motion. The other three components of ground motion are rotations about the three perpendicular axes. These six motions together make up the complex movement of the ground, and understanding each component is crucial preparing for seismic events.

Decomposition of the ground motion to three translational and three rotational components

Why Is It Even Important?

  • Seismology

In seismology, understanding rotational motion helps in improving models of earthquake behavior. These models are used to predict how different types of ground movement, including both translational (back-and-forth) and rotational (twisting) motions, affect the Earth’s surface. By incorporating rotational motion into these models, scientists can gain a more complete understanding of ground shaking, leading to better predictions and preparedness for future earthquakes.

  • Engineering

For engineers, especially those designing buildings, bridges, and other infrastructure, knowing how structures respond to rotational motion can lead to better designs that are more resistant to earthquakes. Additionally, assessing the impact of rotational forces helps in evaluating the safety and stability of existing structures (watch this https://www.usgs.gov/media/videos/shaking-atwood-building-anchorage-alaska).

Measuring Ground Rotational Motion

Measuring rotational motion is challenging, but several techniques have been developed. These techniques can be divided into two main categories: rotational sensors and array-derived rotational motion.

  • Rotational Sensors

Rotational sensors directly measure the twisting and turning of the ground. These include gyroscopes, ring laser gyroscopes, and fiber optic gyroscopes, which detect and measure rotational movements during seismic events. These sensors provide critical data that helps in understanding the complexities of ground motion. Think of them as the seismologist’s version of a ballerina’s sense of balance—except way more precise and without the tutu.

  • Array-Derived Rotational Motion

The array technique for estimation of rotational motion involves using an array of seismometers (instruments that measure ground translational motion) to infer rotational motion. By strategically placing multiple seismometers in a pattern, scientists can analyze the data from these instruments to calculate the rotational components of ground motion.

How Array Technique Works

Imagine placing several seismometers in a grid. Each seismometer records the motion of the ground at its specific location. By comparing the differences in the signals recorded by each seismometer, researchers can derive how the ground beneath the array rotates. This method is highly effective because it uses widely accessible existing technology.

Rotational Motion in Helsinki

Here at the Institute of Seismology, University of Helsinki, we estimate the array-derived rotational motions about the vertical and horizontal axes for almost 500 small-magnitude seismic events that were induced by the 2018 stimulation of the Espoo/Helsinki geothermal reservoir. We process data from the six geophone arrays that were installed in the Helsinki metropolitan area. Despite the small magnitude of the earthquakes, we obtained clean rotational motion records showing the applicability of the array technique for estimating rotational motions caused by such small-magnitude earthquakes.

The arrays of geophones used for recording translational motions from the seismicity induced by the 2018 stimulation of the Espoo/Helsinki geothermal reservoir (read more https://doi.org/10.1785/0220190253)

Some sample array-derived rotational motion timeseries obtained from the translational motion records (read more https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL090403)

Amir Sadeghi-Bagherabadi, university researcher

Natural disaster warning system (LUOVA)

The LUOVA system is a service intended for authorities. It warns about natural disasters that take place in Finland and abroad. LUOVA was established after the earthquake and tsunami disaster that occurred on Boxing Day 2004 in Asia. The system’s aim was to improve and clarify communication related to natural disasters. Institute of Seismology provides information and assessments of hazardous impacts of earthquakes to the LUOVA system.

Structure and functioning of LUOVA

The LUOVA system gathers forecasts, assessments, and warnings from various sources, and creates a real-time situational picture to support the decisions of the authorities. The basis of LUOVA is an information system that enables research institutes to monitor different natural phenomena worldwide and analyze threats, risks, and actual natural disasters. LUOVA offers a uniform reporting method for all types of warnings – one, fast channel in which authorities find the necessary information about natural disasters.

The LUOVA operation center is located at the Finnish Meteorological Institute (FMI) together with the on-call weather services. Experts deliver real-time reviews on natural disasters to the LUOVA web portal. Information providers of LUOVA are Finnish Meteorological Institute (dangerous weather phenomena, sea floods, tsunamis), SYKE (water floods) and the Institute of Seismology (earthquakes, tsunamis).

Earthquake observations in LUOVA

Institute of Seismology provides information and assessments of hazardous impacts of earthquakes to the LUOVA system. The focus is on hazardously big earthquakes abroad mainly at the tourist but also at high-risk destinations, but authorities are also informed about notable earthquakes in Finland. The earthquake alerts and estimates of the LUOVA are based on the Institute’s automatic observation system and on the on-call duty related to it. The on-call seismologist gets information on earthquakes primarily from the SeisComP-based automated system. More information on the events can be found on the websites of international organizations and centers, and on their warning messages.

The on-call seismologist checks, evaluates, and corrects automatic alerts. The risk of the event is assessed, and the event is classified into risk categories 1-4 (1 = extremely dangerous, 2 = dangerous, 3 = potentially dangerous, 4 = not dangerous). The on-call seismologist provides an impact assessment with a more detailed description of the possible consequences for the risk categories 1 to 3 events via the LUOVA system to the authorities. In addition, on-call seismologists will provide an expert opinion and assistance in issuing warnings and assessing the effects of damage, if necessary.

In 2023, 296 events came to the LUOVA system. Of these, 237 were evaluated as risk category 4 events, 51 risk category 3 events, 6 risk category 2 events and 2 risk category 1 events.

Assessment of effects caused by earthquakes

The magnitude of an earthquake and the earthquake effects and consequences are not directly interdependent. When assessing the destructive effects, without direct observations from the event area, priority is given to the magnitude of the earthquake (released energy, destructive power) as well as to the depth of the earthquake (surface waves, tsunami) and the location of the earthquake (centers of population, age and condition of buildings, critical infrastructure). That is, even a small earthquake (magnitude 4-5) occurring at shallow depth below a large population center can cause great damage. On the other hand, a large earthquake (magnitude 6 – 7) in the middle of the wilderness or ocean may not attract any attention (other than that it is detected by the global seismic station network).

Tsunamis relate to large earthquakes (typically above magnitude 7) that occur on the seabed due to vertical movement. Therefore, tsunamis are most commonly generated in subduction zones. Tsunami is different from wind-generated waves in such a way that it puts in motion the sea water in motion at its entire depth, while the effect of wind-generated waves is limited to the surface layer. Tsunami wavelengths and speeds are also significantly higher. The LUOVA on-call seismologist will also issue a warning in connection with the impact assessment if a tsunami can arise from an earthquake.

Recent earthquakes globally can be found on the Institute’s website (https://www.helsinki.fi/en/institute-seismology/earthquakes/earthquakes-globally).

Niina Junno, seismologist

Environmental Seismology – Monitoring More than Earthquakes

Over the last 100 years, the sensitivity of seismic instruments has improved by many orders of magnitude.

A modern seismometer, like the ones installed in the permanent monitoring network in Finland, is capable of measuring movements in the earth as small as nanometers per second (0.000000001 meters/s). Such incredible sensitivity allows seismologists at the Institute of Seismology to detect signals from earthquakes all over the world or see small explosions from mining operations in Sweden. In between earthquakes, though, there exists an entire world of signals recorded on seismometers, hidden in what we used to call background noise.”

When Noise is not Noise

As more and more sensitive instruments were installed around the world, seismologists noticed that, instead of being quiet, the earth was constantly humming with energy. This energy was usually quieter than signals generated by earthquakes, but easily detected with high-quality instruments.

Figure 1: Energy recorded at different seismic periods over 5 years of data from station KEV in Finland and station WRAB in Australia. Peak values at periods of 3-5 seconds (red arrows) are related to energy generated by ocean waves. Plots were generated using EarthScope MUSTANG web services [1].

Figure 1 [1] shows the energy recorded at two different seismometers over 5 years. Station KEV is located near the village of Kevo in Lapland, and station WRAB is in central Australia. Even though they are in two very different places geologically, the energy pattern looks quite similar, with a peak of energy around 3-5 seconds period (0.2-0.33 Hz in frequency). This energy pattern is seen every day, on nearly every seismic station on earth, and while scientists long suspected that this noise is coming from waves interacting in the oceans [2], it was only recently that this was able to be accurately verified [3].

Air, Ice, and Rock

Other earth processes also generate signals that either older seismic equipment could not measure, or we lacked the necessary number of stations nearby, or we did not have the necessary computational power to decode the signals until recently. For example, scientists have been able to track thunderstorms moving across the southern United States [4], and calculate the strength of cyclones in the Pacific Ocean [5], using only seismic data.

As glaciers have been rapidly retreating due to climate change, seismology can also be used to detect glacial surges [6] or small caving events, even being able to determine the direction that the ice fell [7].

Seismic data is even being used to monitor for landslides in near real-time, watching for a landslide that could generate a potentially dangerous tsunami (figure 2) [8]. Monitoring for signals like these are similar in theory to how regular earthquakes are detected and located but using completely new methods to interpret the seismic data and doing it rapidly enough to potentially alert people in danger before the threat arrives.

Figure 2: From Karasözen and West (2024), nine automatically detected landslides at fjords in Alaska using seismic data.

We are in an exciting era of seismology, where many of the technological limitations of previous generations have been lifted. We can use seismology to move past only monitoring for earthquakes and use the tools and our creativity to learn more about the earth system as a whole – the atmosphere, the oceans, and the rock beneath our feet.

Matt Gardine, seismologist

References

[1] Casey, Robert, Mary E. Templeton, Gillian Sharer, Laura Keyson, Bruce R. Weertman, and Tim Ahern. “Assuring the Quality of EarthScope Data with MUSTANG”. Seismological Research Letters 89 (2A) (2018): 630-639. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220170191

[2] Longuet-Higgins, Michael. S. “A theory of the origin of microseisms”. Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. A 243 (1950): 1–35.

[3] Kedar, Sharon, Michael Longuet-Higgins, Frank Webb, Nicholas Graham, Robert Clayton, and Cathleen Jones. “The origin of deep ocean microseisms in the North Atlantic Ocean”. Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. A 464 (2008): 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2007.0277

[4] Tytell, Jonathan, Frank Vernon, Michael Hedlin, Catherine de Groot Hedlin, Juan Reyes, Bob Busby, Katrin Hafner, and Jennifer Eakins. “The USArray Transportable Array as a Platform for Weather Observation and Research”. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 97.4 (2016): 603-619. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00204.1

[5] Gualtieri, Lucia, Suzana J. Camargo, Salvatore Pascale, Flavio M.E. Pons, and Göran Ekström. “The persistent signature of tropical cyclones in ambient seismic noise”. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 484 (2018): 287-294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2017.12.026

[6] Nettles, Meredith, and Göran Ekström. “Glacial earthquakes in Greenland and Antarctica”. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences 38:1 (2010): 467-491. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-earth-040809-152414

[7] Olsen, Kira G., and Meredith Nettles. “Constraints on terminus dynamics at Greenland glaciers from small glacial earthquakes”. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface 124 (2019): 1899–1918 https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JF005054

[8] Karasözen, Ezgi, and Michael E. West. “Toward the Rapid Seismic Assessment of Landslides in Coastal Alaska”. The Seismic Record 4 (1) (2024): 43–51 https://doi.org/10.1785/0320230044

The Finnish mobile seismic instrument pool

Seismologists are scientists who study the earth, from the surface to the core, using physics theories combined with observations from seismic waves travelling through the planet. These observations are required to better understand earthquakes, faults, volcanoes, seismic hazards, landslides, and earth structures, as well as for economic applications such as identifying subsurface mineral or petroleum deposits.

Seismometers are the primary instrument needed to make these observations and so seismologists rely on the availability of these extremely sensitive instruments. In recent years, the production of more cost-effective sensors and access to large-scale data storage and computational facilities has led to an evolution in the number of seismometers used in seismic studies. However, individual sensors are generally too expensive for individual researchers to purchase and operate and thus have been restricted to large private companies or through well-funded but restricted government research consortiums.

To help the access to such equipment to the scientific community, the Finnish mobile seismic instrument pool was created in 2021. It is owned and operated by seven Finnish academic and research institutions: the University of Helsinki, the University of Oulu, the Geological Survey of Finland, the National Land Survey, Aalto University, the Technical Research Center of Finland and the University of Turku. The pool is funded through the Research Council of Finland call for research infrastructures (FIRI),. through the FLEX-EPOS project, under the FIN-EPOS* umbrella.

The initial funding for the project was started in 2021, with the instrument pool build-up phase ending in 2024. After that, the pool will continue to operate indefinitely. By the end of 2024, the pool is expected to include 46 Güralp broadband seismometers and 5 Güralp strong-motion accelerometers, as well as 1229 Geospace and 71 SmartSolo self-contained geophone units. When complete, this pool represents one of the largest mobile seismic instrument pools in Europe available in the public sector.

The pool is made available to researchers and supports domestic and international collaborative projects that enhance data-driven subsurface and environmental applications. Projects can last a few days up to a few years.

Between October 2021 and December 2023, 30 projects have been completed using the pool , generating around 28TB of data – equivalent to 280 Helsinki central libraries Oodi. These projects have helped seismologists further study diverse topics such as ground water, faults, frost quakes, ore bodies, crustal structure and local sedimentary overburden, with many more to come.

If you want to know more, you can check the FLEX-EPOS and seismic instruments wikipage: https://wiki.helsinki.fi/xwiki/bin/view/FLEX/Flex-epos%20Home/#. The pool will also be presented through a poster at the EGU24 meeting (14-19.4.2024), hall X1 at board number X1.120.

Roméo Courbis, University Researcher

 

FLEX-EPOS is funded through the Research Council of FInland FIRI2019 call (funding decisions no. 328984, 328776, 328778-328782, 328784 and 328786).

*FIN-EPOS is a Finnish national node of EPOS (European Plate Observing System).