Category Archives: language choice

Round Table with Professor Edgar Schneider: Similects, universals or something else? Problematizing historical and social perspectives on ESL varieties

|

Together with Raphaël Domange, a PhD student from the University of Stockholm, I am hosting a round table on a most current and relevant topic: the views we hold of second language varieties of English (for example, English as it is used in India, Ghana, Singapore, etc.), and how we talk about and research such varieties.

The round table, which takes place on June 16, 2017, will be led by a leading scholar in the area of World Englishes, Professor Edgar Schneider from the University of Regensberg, Germany.

The day will begin with focused discussions on a few key areas: 1) “Angloversals” vs. similects, 2) education and ideologies, and 3) methods and theory.

In addition to Professor Schneider, we have nine other scholars who will be joining us as discussants. Here is a bit of information about them.

Heli Paulasto, University of Eastern Finland. Heli joins us as an expert on so-called Angloversals. Here are a few of her publications on this topic:

Meriläinen, L. & Paulasto, H. (2017) ‘Embedded Inversion as an Angloversal: Evidence from Inner, Outer, and Expanding Circle Englishes’. In Filppula, M., Klemola, J. & Sharma, D. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of World Englishes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Paulasto, H. (2014) ‘Extended uses of the progressive form in L1 and L2 Englishes.’ English World-Wide 35 (3), 247-276.

Lea Meriläinen, University of Eastern Finland. Lea is also an expert on Angloversals.

Meriläinen, L. & Paulasto, H. 2017. “Embedded Inversion as an Angloversal: Evidence from Inner, Outer, and Expanding Circle Englishes”. In Filppula, M., Klemola, J. & Sharma, D. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of World Englishes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Meriläinen, L. (fc.) “The progressive form in learner Englishes: Examining variation across corpora”. To appear in World Englishes.

Paula Rautionaho, University of Tampere. Paula is investigating the use of progressive vs. non-progressive in ESL varieties. 

“The effect of grammatical contexts on the progressive vs. non-progressive alternation across World Englishes” (with Sandra C. Deshors, ICAME 2017.

Jan-Ola Östman, University of Helsinki. Jan-Ola is interested in language contact, language minorities, language ideologies and language rights.

http://norden.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:730884/FULLTEXT01.pdf

http://norden.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:730884/FULLTEXT01.pdf

Simo Määttä, University of Helsinki. Simo comes from an interpreting and translation perspective. He is also interested in language rights.

Määttä, Simo. (2017, submitted) English as a Lingua Franca in Telephone Interpreting: Reformulations, Mistakes, Representations, and Linguistic Justice. The Interpreter’s Newsletter 22. Special Issue on Corpus-based Dialogue Interpreting Studies. Bendazzoli,C. (ed.).

Määttä, Simo. (2017) ELF, Community Interpreting, and Linguistic Injustice. Paper at the the ELF10 conference at U Helsinki, panel 4 on June 13. 

Joseph McVeigh, University of Helsinki/University of Jyväskylä. Joe is interested in discussing issues that deal with a native-speaker bias and the teaching of English. Joe is currently finishing his PhD for the University of Helsinki.

Andy Kirkpatrick, Griffith University. Andy is interested in the role of local Englishes and langauge education policy in Asia. He is hosting a panel on the future of English as a Lingua Franca at ELF10 Conference in Helsinki.

Iris Schaller-Schwaner, University of Fribourg. Iris is interested in exploring the notion of similects, in addition to practical and oral skills.

Schaller-Schwaner, Iris (2015). ELF oral presentations in a multilingual context: intelligibility, familiarity and agency. In: Bowles, Hugo & Cogo, Alessia (eds.) International Perspectives on English as a Lingua Franca: Pedagogical Insights (International Perspectives in ELT) Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan: 72-95.

Svetlana Vetchinnikova, University of Helsinki. Svetlana is an expert on English as a Lingua Franca. She is a co-organizer of the ELF10 conference in Helsinki.

During the morning session, 9.30 to noon, these discussants and Professor Schneider will discuss our main themes in focus groups. In the afternoon, 1 to 4 pm, Professor Schneider will serve as the main discussant as the groups summarize their discussion. The afternoon session is open to the public.

In pursuit of “Bad English”

|

Later this month, I’m off with my family for a visit to Trump’s America. No, not Trump’s America, per se–that’s just an unfortunate sidenote (I hope) — but rather a visit to the wonderful linguistics program at North Carolina State University, in Raleigh. The researchers in this program have been trendsetters for decades in their community-centered linguistic investigations, providing an inspirational model of how we as scholars can give back tangible benefits to the communities we work with.

The purpose of the visit is to re-acquaint myself and to update my knowledge, from a U.S. perspective, about the relationship of ethnicity, education, language rights and human rights. After 13 years of living in Finland, it is clear that my understanding of the situation in the U.S. has become outdated and distant. I’ll be in Raleigh for just about three months, and during that time I have my work cut out for me: I hope to finish three chapters for my book, “Bad English”: An introduction to language attitudes and ideologies, which is under contract with Routledge, a UK-based publisher. The folks at NCSU, including my host Jeff Reaser, have very generously agreed to give me both feedback and input on my manuscript.

The book is based around a course I have taught at the University of Helsinki for many years. In the course, we talk about how some people have strong attitudes against the way other people speak — for example in a multi-ethnic or urban variety of English — and how that came to be the case. We talk about why language attitudes exist in English, how those attitudes got there, and how they are perpetuated. We also talk about several varieties of English that many (myself not included) would consider marginal or “incorrect”: English as a global lingua franca, creole varieties of English, African American English, and even the English of children who are learning it as their mother tongue. The reason we study all these different varieties is so that we can observe what they have in common, and how the attitudes toward them compare.

The book, which is expected in 2019, will cover the same themes, in addition to discussing London English, New Delhi English, and Singapore English. I clearly have my work cut out for me! I am lucky to have several academic friends whose work I can draw from and who I can collaborate with. My own students have been an immense help with the process, informing the work every step of the way.

To make it crystal clear: the book is NOT about putting down or ridiculing varieties of English and the people who speak them. The reason it is called “Bad English,” in quotes, is because this is how many people refer to these varieties, but without exactly knowing why. This book explains why. In doing so — I am not going to pretend otherwise — I hope to succeed in changing the way readers view these varieties. It seems to have worked on my students; lets see how it goes with a wider audience.

I was surprised to notice that the book is already listed in Amazon India: http://www.amazon.in/Bad-English-introduction-attitudes-ideologies/dp/1138237469 Along with a page count and expected publication date! This is quite amazing, considering I have not written the book yet! Nonetheless, feel free to leave a review. (I’m joking, I’m joking)

language choice, language audience

|

photo-3 (2)Today, while shopping at my neighborhood grocery store, I noticed this sign for the first time, although it must have been there for at least a couple of months.

(I am noticing that the photo is rendered here in a terrible quality. There seems to be some sort of automatic setting on the university blog pages that reduces the quality of images, no doubt to save space. You’ll have to take my word for it that the text in my original photo was actually legible.)

OK, I live in Finland. In downtown Helsinki, to be exact. The two official languages in Finland are Finnish and Swedish. Although it’s hard to make out in this photograph, you can see that the most prominent language on this sign, placed on top, is Russian. There is text in Finnish, as well, but it is much smaller and appears underneath the Russian. It says: “Dear customers, please don’t take shopping carts outside the store area.”

The official message of this sign is pretty basic — mundane, even. But think about the subtext and what it says about the society I live in. The Finnish is there almost as something gratuitous — it’s there because it kind of has to be; it is in Finland, after all. Yet it’s smaller and not prominent: the underlying message is that Finnish people don’t need to be told to not take shopping carts outside. And Swedish speakers? Not a chance! Everyone knows that Swedish speakers don’t shop at Lidl, anyway — they are in their swanky neighborhoods shopping at the Finnish equivalent of Whole Foods or Dean and Deluca, right?

Nor is the sign written in English, which, of course, is the international lingua franca. The underlying assumptions here seem to be that a Russian-speaking customer a) is likely to walk out of the store with a shopping cart, and b) will not understand an admonition not to do so in any language other than Russian.

It would be interesting to know if the Russian text on the sign is actually grammatical, and, if so, if it is pragmatically appropriate for this setting. Is the the language choice on this sign politically correct? That’s a question I can’t even begin to contemplate.

Incidentally, I have actually noticed Russian customers at this particular grocery store, stocking up on staples such as toothpaste and other dry goods. That is a harsh reminder of how politics (ie, the embargo to Russia) affects the everyday lives of people who still need to find a way to keep their teeth clean. And, apparently, that they need a reminder to not take the shopping carts home to Russia with them.