Kaupunkitutkimus jalkautuu Jätkäsaareen

Kaupunkitutkimus jalkautuu Jätkäsaareen, ja puhun tänään asuntomessutapahtumassa Jätkäsaaren suunnittelusta ja sen vaihtoehtoisista tarinoista – Jätkä-saari vai naisten kaupunki? Ja miksi kertomukset suunnittelussa ovat tärkeitä?

Aika: 3.-7.9.2018 klo 14:00-16:00
Paikka: Jätkäsaari-paviljonki, Hyväntoivonpuisto, Helsingin Jätkäsaaressa

“Millaista tutkimusta kaupungeista, asuinalueista, kortteleista ja meistä ihmisistä tehdään tällä hetkellä? Kaupunkitutkimus jalkautuu kortteliin -kokonaisuuksissa tutkijat esittelevät viimeisimpiä tutkimustuloksiaan lyhyissä, kansankielisissä esityksissään. Tapahtumapaikkana on Jätkäsaari-paviljonki. Tilaisuuksissa on mahdollisuus keskustella ja kysellä suoraan tutkijoilta. Tilaisuuksien jälkeen on mahdollisuus tavata tutkijoita.”

http://asuntomessut.fi/tulevat-messut/kaupunkielamaa/kaupunkitutkimus-jalkautuu-jatkasaareen/

Puhun itse tänään (5.9.) omasta tutkimuksesta Jätkäsaaren suunnittelun ja kirjallisuuden kertomuksista klo 14-16:

Keskiviikko 5.9.2018 klo 14:00-16:00

Kertomukset, paikat ja historiat

“Kaupungit ovat kerroksellisia: sekä rakennettu ympäristö että paikkoihin liittyvät kertomukset, muistot, mielikuvat ja kokemukset ilmentävät menneisyyttä, nykyisyyttä ja tulevaisuutta. Tässä tilaisuudessa Helsingin, Tampereen ja Turun yliopistojen tutkijat kertovat kaupungeista dynaamisina paikkoina, joihin asukkaat ja toimijat liittävät omia merkityksiään.”

 

Asukkaat ja toimijat nykyistä, mennyttä ja tulevaa paikallisuutta määrittämässä
Pauliina Latvala-Harvilahti, Turun yliopisto/Helsingin yliopisto, 1.8. alkaen Tampereen yliopisto

Jätkäsaari rakenteellisina kerrostumina – kolme näkökulmaa kaupunginosan kehitykseen
Matti Hannikainen, Helsingin yliopisto

Jätkäsaari vai Naisten kaupunki? Kuviteltu tuleva Jätkäsaari suunnittelussa ja kirjallisuudessa
Lieven Ameel, Turun yliopisto

Paluu perinteiseen urbaaniin kaupunkirakentamiseen Helsingin kaupunkisuunnittelussa?
Miika Norppa, Helsingin yliopisto

Saavutettavuustyökalut sopivien asuntojen etsinnässä
Henrikki Tenkanen, Helsingin yliopisto

Tutkijoiden esittelyt:

Pauliina Latvala-Harvilahti on kulttuuriperinnön, erityisesti muistitiedon dosentti Turun yliopistossa sekä folkloristiikan dosentti Helsingin yliopistossa. Hän johtaa Elävä Suomenlinna -hanketta. Elokuun alusta alkaen hän toimii Tampereen yliopistossa yhteiskuntatieteiden tiedekunnassa yliopistotutkijana.

Matti Hannikainen on kaupunkihistorian tutkija Helsingin yliopistossa. Hän on tutkinut erityisesti Lontoon ja Helsingin historiaa.

Lieven Ameel on kaupunkitutkimuksen ja kaupunkisuunnittelun menetelmien dosentti Tampereen teknillisessä yliopistossa sekä vieraileva tutkija Turun yliopiston ihmistieteellisessä tutkijakollegiumissa.

Miika Norppa on kaupunkimaantieteen tutkija Geotieteiden ja maantieteen laitoksella Helsingin yliopistossa. Hän on tutkinut muun muassa eurooppalaisten kaupunkikeskustojen ja Helsingin kantakaupungin historiallista kehittymistä.

Henrikki Tenkanen työskentelee tutkijana Helsingin Yliopiston Digital Geography Labissa. Hän on kaupunkianalytiikkaan keskittyvän Mapple Oy:n perustajajäsen. Taustaltaan hän on maantieteestä väitellyt datatieteilijä, joka on innoissaan kaikesta liikkumiseen ja saavutettavuuteen liittyvistä kysymyksistä sekä teknologisista ratkaisuista, joilla voidaan tukea päätöksentekoa ja kaupunkisuunnittelua.

Palimpsest Cities at Aboagora

Speaking today (22.8.18) at Aboagora on Palimpsest Cities and the concept of burden in city literature.
Many thanks to Silja Laine and everyone at Aboagora for putting together our session and the rest of the excellent program!

I will be speaking a bit about commodity fetishism, the city as juggernaut, and the possibility of redemption in city literature, from The Great Gatsby to Riku Korhonen’s Kahden ja yhden yön tarinoita. Most of our session will be an open discussion with Jason Finch from Åbo Akademi, the Estonian author Jan Kaus, and myself.
I had the honour to meet Jan Kaus during an Association for Literary Urban Studies symposium in Tallinn – Jan Kaus is not only an inspiring literary author, he also has the rare gift to speak both eloquently and poetically about his own literary work and its relationship to cities.

Palimpsest cities: The past as burden and possibility in city literature
Lieven Ameel
Jason Finch
Jan Kaus

Every city carries the traces of its multiple pasts. Some of these are present on the surface in ruins or historic buildings which are visited by tourists. Some are hidden beneath newer buildings or revised road layouts. In this session two scholars of urban literature meet a creative writer preoccupied with his native city to discuss various aspects of burden and possibility in urban place. We approach the theme of this year’s Aboagora through the concept of palimpsest.
Originating in manuscript studies, the word palimpsest has a primary sense defined by the Oxford English Dictionary as ‘a parchment or other writing surface on which the original text has been effaced or partially erased, and then overwritten by another; a manuscript in which later writing has been superimposed on earlier (effaced) writing’. In extended use, palimpsest means something ‘reused or altered while still retaining traces of its earlier form; a multilayered record’. In common with other writers and researchers, we see cities as sites containing many layers and retaining aspects of ‘earlier form’: as palimpsests.
The urban past contains multiple types of burden and possibility and we will introduce literary explorations of specific examples: Tallinn, Turku, and New York. The burden of the urban past can include the effort to comprehend past injustices or crimes, and acts that now seem shameful or unacceptable. The possibility this contains is a new ‘multilayered’ history that can include elements of conflict or radical change.

Contested Planning, Persuasive Storytelling – with James A. Throgmorton – 15.8., Helsinki

Ever since I began to be interested in the narrative structures in planning, I have been quoting, teaching, and using the work of James A. Throgmorton. Throgmorton’s texts on planning as a form of persuasive storytelling are still some of the most accessible and lucid reflections on the fundamentally narrative features of planning – and they remain part of the foundation of any narrative theory of planning.

(source: Chicago UP)

So I’m understandably exited to participate in the event “Contested Planning, Persuasive Storytelling”, with James A. Throgmorton, in Helsinki, 15.8. The event is organized by the Academy project SCENSLECO – “Strategic spatial planning with momentum gaining scenario storytelling: legitimacy contested?”, with ao. colleagues from the time when I was a visiting researcher at the YTK Land Use Planning and Urban Studies Group at Aalto University.

I will present on metaphors in the planning of the New York waterfront, and in particular on how metaphorizations from The Great Gatsby have had a continuous influence on thinking of New York’s development.

More on my current research here – and on my publications here.

Examining City Futures in Literary Urban Studies – London 2 August 2018

Presenting today at the “Big Data and Urban Governance on the Margins of the City” workshop at King’s College, London. The workshop is part of a two-day kick-off of smart city / urban futures research projects. My presentation, “Metaphor into Matter: Examining City Futures in Literary Urban Studies”, looks at the use of metaphor in urban planning and policy. The aim is to use metaphor analysis to unpack rhetorical strategies in planning, and to bring into focus competing planning visions. I also argue that metaphor analysis can be applied not only an instrument for critical analysis, but also as tool for planning. There is considerable potential for a more conscious inclusion of metaphorizations of personal and communal relations to urban environments in PPGIS. Metaphor, and more broadly concepts from literary and narrative studies, can play a role in moving from quantitative “smart” technologies to more qualitative approaches.

I will examine the development of the Kalasatama district in Helsinki, with specific reference to Kalasatama’s smart city aspirations.

Many thanks to Ayona Datta and everyone at the research project for inviting me to participate!

source: hel.fi

I’m drawing in part on some earlier published work:

Ameel, Lieven 2016: “Emplotting urban regeneration: Narrative strategies in the case of Kalasatama, Helsinki.” DATUTOP 34. Re-City. Future City – combining disciplines., 222-240. 19 pages.

https://tutcris.tut.fi/portal/files/6896312/DATUTOP_34.pdf

 

“‘Citiness’: Networks, Scales and Hierarchies in Literary Urban Studies”, Orientations 2018

Speaking today together with Jason Finch at the #Orientations2018 conference on narrative and place in Nottingham.

We’ll present some of the ideas that developed within the Association for Literary Urban Studies and in relation to work within the Palgrave series in literary urban studies. Our aim is to emphasize (in the context of literary fiction and literary urban studies) the concept of “citiness”: the elements that are specific to the city and the urban condition, and an awareness of what this “citiness” brings to the source material and what it implies in terms of methodological avenues of inquiry. One approach is to move from quantitative to more qualitative features of the (literary) city experience and, eventually, toward cutting across functional, inter-relational, and scalar complexities.

The City: Myth and Materiality – London, 29 May 2018

Wide-ranging and highly multidisciplinary set of topics in 29 May symposium “The City: Myth and Materiality“, hosted at the Institute of Historical Research.

The symposium is organised by the Association for Literary Urban Studies (ALUS), in collaboration with the Institute of Historical Research (IHR), University of London, with the support of the Turku Institute for Advanced Studies (TIAS).

Several of the people present have been part of the broader research network connected with the Association for Literary Urban Studies, and this symposium is also a reunion with many highly regarded colleagues I’ve worked with before – a.o. Markku Salmela, Giada Peterle, Richard Dennis, Peter Jones, Jason Finch, Elle-Mari Talivee, and Meeria Vesala, among others – and many new acquaintances.

My own presentation looks at the metaphor of the 6th borough in Vision 2020 and Foer’s text “the 6th borough”.

Thanks to all participants for talks, comments, discussions – and looking forward to continue developing these themes together within literary urban studies, and across disciplines (geography, urban history, literary studies).

Futures of Post-Industrial Cities – presentation at the University of Duisburg-Essen, 24 May 2018

I gave a lecture today at the University of Duisburg-Essen, with as title “Imagining Futures for Postindustrial Cities at the Water: Helsinki and New York City in Fiction and Planning” (24 May 2018). This was a good opportunity to rethink some of my work in the context of postindustrial cities and to get to know other perspectives on similar questions.

Many thanks to prof. Jens Gurr and prof. Barbara Buchenau for the invitation and for the warm welcome. Inspiring also to get better acquainted with the project “Scripts for Postindustrial Urban Futures: American Models,Transatlantic Interventions”, a fascinating, wide-ranging project that promises to bring valuable new insights to the many ways in which urban development of post-industrial cities is narrated.

Thanks also to Lena Mattheis for the kind welcome and moderating the discussion.

Looking forward to continuing collaboration on these urgent and inspiring thematics.

Update: my talk is now online here:

https://duepublico.uni-duisburg-essen.de/servlets/DerivateServlet/Derivate-45570/Guest_Lecture_Ameel.mp4

Presenting at the Marine Research Laboratory for Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Turku, 18.5.2018

Presenting my research on future cities at the water across genres, today in Turku, at the Marine Research Laboratory for Humanities and Social Sciences.

The context is Wave Riders (AHAAallonharjalle in Finnish), “an active research and teaching laboratory for the humanities and social sciences at the University of Turku specializing in the study of maritime and other water systems. Its goal is to gather together researchers  whose research is related to the maritime and shipping-thematic collaboration in the University of Turku’s new strategy. Along with participating in various projects and organizing regular research seminars we also conduct commisioned research.”

More on the program here and below (in Finnish):

Meritutkimusseminaari pe 18.5.2018

Turun yliopiston humanistis-yhteiskuntatieteellinen merentutkimusverkosto Aallonharjalle (AHA) järjestää tutkimusseminaarin PE 18.5.2018 klo 9:30-12:00. Tapahtumassa on tarkoituksena paitsi tutustua verkoston piirissä tehtävään tutkimukseen, myös ideoida yhteisiä hankkeita ja viritellä uusia yhteistyömuotoja.  Paikkana on seminaarihuone Pha2 (Pharma City, Itäinen Pitkäkatu 4, Turku).

Tilaisuuden ohjelma:

  • Lieven Ameel:  Narratives of Future Cities at the Water
  • Outi Luova:  Merialueyhteistyön vertaileva tutkimus: Japaninmeri, Itämeri, Karibianmeri
  • Jaana Kouri:  Koettu ja kuviteltu Itämeren vesiympäristöön liittyvä kulttuurinen tieto
  • Laura Seesmeri:  Näkökulmia vedenalaiseen maisemaan, autoetnografiseen maisemantutkimukseen ja kenttätöihin Suomenlinnassa
  • Nina Tynkkynen:  Ilmastonmuutostieto ja Itämeri
  • Lauri Kaira: John Nurmisen säätiön ja Loki-palvelun esittely
  • Keskustelua

Tilaisuuteen on vapaa pääsy, mutta ennakkoilmoittautuminen on kahvitarjoilun vuoksi suotavaa.

Reflections on Montreal – in the shadow of Narrative2018

It’s been a few weeks since I’m back from the Narrative2018 conference in Montreal, where I enjoyed a wide range of presentations and discussions in a variety of fields of the study of narrative – thanks for the inspiring ideas. And thanks, also, to everyone who commented on my paper, which dealt with “Futures of New York – Narrating Environmental Agency in Fiction and Non-fiction.”

As a researcher of cities, I’m glad I also found some time to get to know a bit of Montreal. Some thoughts here on the city and the books that communicated something of its past to me.

A first book I read was Christian Crouch’s Nobility Lost: French and Canadian martial cultures, Indians, and the end of New France (2014). It’s been some time I had been looking for a good, general history book about the Seven Years’ War in North America, and in Crouch’s book I found an eminently readable, fascinating study of the conflict, in particular in terms of different cultural perspectives on violence.

(By coincidence, I read the book immediately after reading a new translation of William of Tyre’s History of the Kingdom of Jerusalem, and was struck by some of the similarities – however far-fetched that may seem – between the narratives of violence and conflict in both books, especially in relation to differences between ”settlers” (and 2nd, 3rd generation) and ”newcomers” newly arrived from France; and different perspectives by both groups in terms also of alliances with indigenous / local nations.)

A second book, specifically on Montreal, which I read with great interests, is Ceri Morgan’s Mindscapes of Montreal. My knowledge of Quebec and Montreal was extremely general, and my knowledge of the literature of Montreal basically non-existent. Morgan’s book provided an accessible, well-structured, and continuously though-provoking overview of the literature of Montreal in the period 1960-2005.

Inevitably, a lot about the book reminded me of my own dissertation, about the Finnish-written literature of Helsinki in 1890-1940 – how to deal with literary representations in bilingual cities located at the periphery of continental geographies; what to select, how much to tell about historical and cultural specifities. Mindscapes of Montreal manages to be entertaining and informative to a general reader, as well as delving deep into more detailed analysis of specific novels. And it passed the test of every good literary urban studies book: it gives the reader the desire to go back to the city streets for new strolls, new discoveries; and also the desire to get to the book shops and get to know some of these books first-head. One of the (many) books I really wanted to pick up on the basis of Morgan’s book is Pierre Turgeon’ s Prochainement sur cet écran, which sounds as crazy as it sounds mesmerizing.

After rummaging through a variety of bookshops (some with extensive Montreal/Quebec bookshelves and some none at all), I bought Nicolas Dickner’s Nikolski, which provided a poetic way to extend my stay in Montreal. Much to cherish here for anyone with an interest in cartography, maps, exile, expulsions, multiple ontological orientations, dirt, and urban archaeologies (the scene with the activist archeologist – several, in fact – practising guerilla dumpster diving is unforgettable). There’s also a lot that I wouldn’t have been able to relate to without Morgan’s book and Crouch’s book; the expulsion of the Acadians, for example, which features quite largely in the novel; the dislocations caused by the construction of Mirabel airport, which also has relevance; and the October Crisis.

Lovely to note that Montreal seems to have a burgeoning comic book culture, with a considerable amount of volumes also set in Quebec and Montreal. Haphazardly I bought Paul en apartement by Michel Rabagliati. One of the things that I noticed, especially when reading it next to Nikolski, was the undercurrent in both of these books of Belgian comic book classics – references, in both books to several Tintin classics; and in the Nikolski bookshop passage, with regular references to Bob Morane (the fictional book shops seems to have a whole section devoted to this Belgian French-written classic which also belongs to my youth culture strata).

Hope to get back to Montreal in the future, for now I’ll continue spending time there with the mediation of books.

Helsinki media city – 7 May 2018

I participate today in the “Helsinki media city” panel at the Helsinki University Think Corner (in Finnish), organizd by DiMe -project.

At first I was not too sure how much I could offer to this fascinating theme, but upon second thoughts from imaginaries of Helsinki in literature and in planning documents, from polyphony in urban planning and the possibilities of storytelling through GIS, from parkour videos to an interest in the flâneur, my research has touched upon a range of issues with relevance for thinking the city as media. Looking forward to lively discussions.

Offical programme:

“Helsinki mediakaupunkina – kuka näkyy ja kenen ääni kuuluu?

Tiedekulma

Mediakaupunki on käsite, jonka avulla tutkijat ja kaupunkisuunnittelijat ovat viime vuosina yrittäneet hahmottaa, miten digitaalinen media ja urbaani elämä kietoutuvat toisiinsa. Kokemus elämästä kaupungissa on medioitunut monin tavoin. Julkiset tilat ovat täynnä mainoksia ja näyttöjä, valvontakamerat seuraavat kaupunkilaisia ja kaupunkilaiset pitävät keskenään yhteyttä toisiinsa yhä enemmän erilaisten digitaalisten laitteiden kautta ja välityksellä. Myös viranomaiset ja päättäjät viestivät keskenään ja kaupunkilaisille eri medioiden välityksellä. Mediakaupungissa taloudelliset, poliittiset ja kaupunkilaisten arjen intressit kohtaavat, mutta myös törmäävät monin tavoin.

Helsinki mediakaupunkina –keskustelutilaisuus haastaa tutkijoita, päättäjiä, viranomaisia, taiteilijoita ja kaupunkiaktivisteja kriittisesti tarkastelemaan, millainen mediakaupunki Helsinki tänään on. Kenen ehdoilla sitä rakennetaan? Kuka nähdään ja kenen ääni kuuluu? Entä mihin suuntaan mediakaupunkia tulisi kehittää?

Tilaisuus etenee skenaarioiden kautta ja päättyy tulevaisuuden mediakaupungin visioimiseen.

Keskustelemassa ovat:

Joonas Pekkanen. Kaupunkiaktiivi ja Helsingin kaupungin Digi Helsinki -hankkeen työntekijä.
Susani Mahadura. Helsinkiläinen radiotoimittaja Ylellä, dokumenttielokuvan ohjaaja.
Pekka Sauri. Helsingin apulaiskaupunginjohtaja 2003–2017. Työelämäprofessori HY:lla.
Anna Jensen. Kuraattori, taiteilija ja tutkija. Interventiotaidetta kaupunkitilassa. Aalto yliopisto.
Johanna Sumiala. Mediatutkija HY:lla ja Diginuoruus mediakaupungissa -hankkeen vastuullinen johtaja.
Lieven Ameel. Kaupunkitutkija Turun yliopistossa. Väitöskirja Helsingistä kirjallisuudessa.

Keskustelutilaisuuden järjestää Helsingin yliopiston, Tampereen yliopiston, nuorisotutkimusverkoston ja Pietarin Higher School of Economics –yliopiston yhteinen hanke Diginuoruus mediakaupungissa. Hanketta johtaa dosentti Johanna Sumiala Helsingin yliopiston valtiotieteellisestä tiedekunnasta. Hankkeen rahoittaja on Koneen Säätiö.”

https://helsinginyliopisto.etapahtuma.fi/fi-fi/Kalenteri/Suomi?id=52356&_ga=2.263258252.1425218050.1525695353-1285087894.1523365407#.WvBDe3–nX4