“Arctic Law and Governance: The Role of China and Finland,” in conversation with Timo Koivurova

In 2014, the Northern Institute of Environmental and Minority Law (NIEM, Arctic Centre) at the University of Lapland initiated a project to study and compare Arctic Law and Governance in Finland and in China, in cooperation with researchers from Wuhan University, China. The project identified similarities and differences between the positions of Finland (as an EU Member State) and China on Arctic law and governance.

In February 2017, a book titled “Arctic Law and Governance: The Role of China and Finland” was published as a result of the project. The book compares Finnish and Chinese legal and policy stances in specific policy areas of relevance for the Arctic, including maritime sovereignty, scientific research, marine protected areas, the Svalbard Treaty and Arctic Council co-operation. The book offers general conclusions on Finnish and Chinese approaches to Arctic governance and international law, as well as new theoretical insights on Arctic governance.

Timo Koivurova, the Principal Investigator for the project, is a Research Professor and the Director of the Arctic Centre of University of Lapland, Finland. Mr. Koivurova has specialized in various aspects of international law applicable in the Arctic and Antarctic region. His research work addresses the interplay between different levels of environmental law, legal status of indigenous peoples, law of the sea in the Arctic waters, integrated maritime policy in the EU, the role of law in mitigating/adapting to climate change, the function and role of the Arctic Council in view of its future challenges and the possibilities for an Arctic treaty. He has been involved as an expert in several international processes globally and in the Arctic region and has published on the above-mentioned topics extensively. This newly-published book adds one more to the list. We had a privilege to interview Mr. Koivurova about the highlights and main findings of the project.

What got you interested in comparative research between Finland and China?

China was accepted as an observer to the predominant inter-governmental forum in the Arctic, the Arctic Council, in Kiruna ministerial meeting in 2013. The group of researchers from Finland and China became interested in studying how Finland’s (also EU’s as Finland is a member state of the European Union) and China’s policy and legal stances differ. Both Finland and China are countries that do not have a coastline to the Arctic Ocean and both China and EU are now acting as observers to the Arctic Council, even if the EU’s formal observer status has not yet been finally accepted. Moreover, as China has not produced a policy statement outlining its Arctic policy, it is highly relevant to look at the Chinese approach to international issues of central importance for the Arctic. That includes fishing in high seas, challenges of biodiversity outside of national jurisdiction, relations with indigenous peoples globally or the questions of the freedom of navigation in and the status of Arctic passages. China may have not declared its approach to such issues specifically as regards the Arctic, but it has produced statements and actions that allow us to understand country’s general approach. The comparison of Chinese approaches with those of a long-term Arctic player (and the one who initiated Arctic cooperation at the end of the 1980s), allows to capture the similarities and differences, and especially areas where China could be at odds with positions taken by Arctic states. Finland – not being an Arctic Ocean coastal state – is here a good benchmark.

What are the main conclusions of your research?

First of all, China, even if many have feared to the contrary, has been and continues to act in a responsible manner in the Arctic. China has in fact tried to keep a low profile, accepting the primary role of Arctic states in the region. Chinese relations with Russia are particularly strong as regards the Arctic. In the Arctic, international law and international rules in fact strengthen China’s position, providing access and rights that could not be achievable (at least presently) via power politics measures.

Authors see a possibility for China to be a stronger actor in the Arctic, first, by building internal capacity as regards knowledge on the Arctic issues and Arctic cooperation, second, by strengthening bilateral ties with Arctic states, third, by becoming more active in the working groups of the Arctic Council, where most of the forum’s activity takes place (that requires expertise and resources), and fourth, by formulating a better defined Arctic strategy. Furthermore, as coastal states may limit access of Chinese scientists to areas under national jurisdiction (or states’ sovereign rights), China should facilitate its research interests by becoming active participant in the organizations for research cooperation. So far, China’s activity in the expert work within the Arctic Council has been rather limited. Also Chinese engagement with Arctic indigenous peoples was generally incidental.

China, while a global great power, is not a principle actor in the Arctic region specifically. At the same time, actors like Finland play above (and more than) their global weight in Arctic governance. As a consequence, a variety of Arctic-focused cooperative linkages have been established between small Nordic states and the global great power. China and Finland appear in fact to share a number of perspectives on Arctic affairs, despite asymmetry in country’s positions and different pathways to their interests in the Arctic region and Arctic cooperation. That includes interest in Arctic economic development, consequences of climate change in the Arctic, as well as countries’ Arctic expertise. In terms of political rhetoric, the discourses on economic possibilities and environmental vulnerability are visible in both countries. In turn, China and EU (and Finland) may diverge on the conservation of marine biodiversity in Arctic high seas.

Did you come across something unexpected during the research process?

It was interesting that we were able to discuss very openly how differently social sciences are practiced in China and in Finland. In Finland, researchers many times start from a neutral viewpoint as to how their own country has taken action, and freely criticize the country for its conduct from various viewpoints, whereas in China social sciences and legal studies explore opportunities for the country to advance its policy and legal stance.

Overall, Chinese international positions of relevance to the Arctic have proven to be generally uncontroversial and within the mainstream of what is observed in the international community at large. That may be a surprise for those expecting Chinese expansionism to be visible in the Arctic context.

How do you feel now that the project is over? Or is it?

The co-operation continues with various research institutes in China and Finland, for instance via the China-Nordic Arctic Research Centre, to which the Arctic Centre was one of the founding members. In addition, the co-operation with our colleagues in Wuhan University continues. Our research group in Rovaniemi certainly acquired much better understanding of the Chinese ideas about the Arctic and its significance for Arctic governances.

What will your next research topic be? Will you continue comparative research between China and Finland?

Yes, the work continues also in that respect. We are currently interested for instance in the Chinese-Russian political and economic relations as regards the Arctic.

The newly released book, co-edited by Mr. Koivurova, is available for purchase on the publisher’s website.

 

 

Author: Cristina Juola

Book launch on the role of Finland and China in Arctic Law and Governance!

In 2014, the Northern Institute of Environmental and Minority Law (NIEM, Arctic Centre) at the University of Lapland initiated a project to study and compare Arctic Law and Governance in Finland and in China, in cooperation with researchers from Wuhan University, China. The project identified similarities and differences between the positions of Finland (as an EU Member State) and China on Arctic law and governance.

In February 2017, a book titled Arctic Law and Governance: The Role of China and Finland was published as a result of the project. The book compares Finnish and Chinese legal and policy stances in specific policy areas of relevance for the Arctic, including maritime sovereignty, scientific research, marine protected areas, the Svalbard Treaty and Arctic Council co-operation. The book offers general conclusions on Finnish and Chinese approaches to Arctic governance and international law, as well as new theoretical insights on Arctic governance. “As an observer of Arctic Council, China shall play a greater and more responsible role in protecting the Arctic and promoting cooperation with Arctic countries,” Qin Tianbao, main Chinese partner of the Project and editor of the newly published book, concludes.

Mr. Qin is a Luojia Professor of Law, Director of the Research Institute of Environmental Law, Professor of the China Institute of Boundary and Ocean Studies and the European Studies Centre at Wuhan University, and Co-Editor-in-Chief of the Chinese Journal of Environmental Law. “One of my research fields is Arctic law and policy. Considering the esteemed reputation of our Finnish colleagues and our existing cooperation, we reached agreement to conduct comparative study.” Mr. Qin is planning to continue conducting comparative research between China and Finland in the future as well, in the field of marine environmental issues in the Arctic. “This project was very successful, and we hope to continue such cooperation.”

Timo Koivurova is the Principal Investigator for the project, is a Research Professor and the Director of the Arctic Centre of University of Lapland, Finland. We ask him about the key findings of the project. “China, while a global great power, is not a principle actor in the Arctic region specifically. At the same time, actors like Finland play above (and more than) their global weight in Arctic governance. As a consequence, a variety of Arctic-focused cooperative linkages have been established between small Nordic states and the global great power. China and Finland appear in fact to share a number of perspectives on Arctic affairs, despite asymmetry in country’s positions and different pathways to their interests in the Arctic region and Arctic cooperation. That includes interest in Arctic economic development, consequences of climate change in the Arctic, as well as countries’ Arctic expertise. In terms of political rhetoric, the discourses on economic possibilities and environmental vulnerability are visible in both countries. In turn, China and EU (and Finland) may diverge on the conservation of marine biodiversity in Arctic high seas.”

Mr. Koivurova has specialized in various aspects of international law applicable in the Arctic and Antarctic region. His research work addresses the interplay between different levels of environmental law, legal status of indigenous peoples, law of the sea in the Arctic waters, integrated maritime policy in the EU, the role of law in mitigating/adapting to climate change, the function and role of the Arctic Council in view of its future challenges and the possibilities for an Arctic treaty. He has been involved as an expert in several international processes globally and in the Arctic region and has published on the above-mentioned topics extensively. This newly-published book adds one more to the list. We had a privilege to interview Mr. Koivurova about the highlights and main findings of the project. Read the full interview here.

The book, “Arctic Law and Governance: The Role of China and Finland,” edited by Timo Koivurova, Qin Tianbao, Sébastien Duyck and Tapio Nykänen, is available for purchase on the publisher’s website.

Author: Cristina D. Juola

Interview with Lauri Tammi, China-specialist, business consultant and entrepreneur

Doing business in China is often viewed as something distant, unfamiliar and challenging, demanding one to understand a completely different culture and working habits to achieve success. Yet, it is commonly acknowledged that China’s economic rise provides enormous opportunities for foreign business. Mr. Lauri Tammi, CEO of Slush Beijing 2015, consultant and an active entrepreneur in China, is an inspiring personality who has constantly pushed Sino-Finnish cooperation forward on numerous spheres for over a decade. Mr. Tammi’s perspective offers an encouraging view of what doing business in China might feel like.

Mr. Tammi has a varied and active background on China through study and research, business, and innovation and technology. Before delving into the world of Chinese entrepreneurship, Mr. Tammi has been living the “Chinese dream” by gathering experience in start-ups and companies in China. In 2015, he brought the famous Slush Helsinki to Beijing. He built a team and inspired a group of volunteers to realize the event with very little outside support. He then gained experience as a Community Manager at Nihao, a Chinese service provider and network startup, and as a Health IT Consultant on China for a leading Nordic data management business, AVAINTEC.

With his diverse background, Mr. Tammi has recently commenced with consultancy. His company helps Chinese businesses to internationalize and provides support for Finnish businesses to work with the Chinese. “I had to try different things to know what I really want to do. As I gathered experience, it was time to establish my own business. There is always limits to self-actualization when you are working for somebody else,” he says over a WeChat phone call, an app that is being used not only for instant messaging and phone calls, but also for shopping and payment, ordering a cab, and for public social media – just one example of how overwhelming the internet sector is in China.

But isn’t it difficult to enter the Chinese market as a foreigner? “Finnish people are highly valued and trusted in China. Here I can do things on a much bigger scale than in Finland. I feel that I have a competitive advantage simply by being a Finn,” Mr. Tammi explains. “Finland is a big buzz word in China right now. Finnish people and products are respected here. This in itself gives you a competitive edge.”

However, the complex Chinese environment is very different from the Nordic rules-based society. Certain adaptability is therefore required to grasp the massive opportunities of starting and doing business in China. “Of course, the Chinese culture is more complex and versatile for a person coming from Finland. A flexible attitude and an open mind get you far. You need to be sincerely interested in the culture and the people here. If you do, being a Finn opens many doors.”

Also, there are personal challenges and questions to examine. “As anywhere else, you need to consider your financial and family situation – whether you may plan for long-term living in China, or if you prefer to work from Finland.” With anyone planning a China-related career, especially if it involves living in the country, Mr. Tammi encourages learning Mandarin. “Knowing how to speak the language not only opens new business opportunities, but also improves the quality of everyday life.”

Mr. Tammi encourages all interested in China to take a small risk and experiment with the possibility of working in China. He is confident that China offers a wide range of research and job opportunities in a number of fields.  “China is a place where one can realize him or herself. There is so much going on, especially in the tech sector. When doing business, the administrative and the legal aspects are of great importance. There is great potential in Sino-Finnish cooperation in this regard.”

Mr. Tammi and Dean of the Helsinki University Law Faculty, Chair of the Center’s Board, Kimmo Nuotio.

For students interested to learn about Chinese business and law, the Center’s member universities a variety of relevant courses. Dr. Yihong Zhang, Finnish China Law Center, will be offering the following courses at the University of Helsinki, Faculty of Law, in the coming academic year:

By Cristina D. Juola

Assistant Professor Samuli Seppänen donated his latest book to our library collection

9781316506189 Samuli Seppänen,  assistant professor at the Faculty of Law of The Chinese University of Hong Kong, donated his latest book: “Ideological Conflict and the Rule of Law in Contemporary China” (Cambridge University Press, 2016) to our library collection. We are thankful for this contribution, which will certainly be of great support to students and researchers in understanding rule of law with Chinese characteristics.

 

Ideological Conflict and the Rule of Law in Contemporary China studies ideological divisions within Chinese legal academia and their relationship to arguments about the rule of law. The book describes argumentative strategies used by Chinese legal scholars to legitimize and subvert China’s state-sanctioned ideology. It also examines Chinese efforts to invent new, alternative rule of law conceptions. In addition to this descriptive project, the book advances a more general argument about the rule of law phenomenon, insisting that many arguments about the rule of law are better understood in terms of their intended and actual effects rather than as analytic propositions or descriptive statements. To illustrate this argument, the book demonstrates that various paradoxical, contradictory and otherwise implausible arguments about the rule of law play an important role in Chinese debates about the rule of law. Paradoxical statements about the rule of law, in particular, can be useful for an ideological project.

Professor Ulla Liukkunen spoke at the 6th Rule of Law Forum in Beijing

Professor Ulla Liukkunen speaking at the Rule of Law Forum (CASS, November 2016).
Professor Ulla Liukkunen speaking at the Rule of Law Forum (CASS, November 2016).

The Law Institute of the Chinese Academy of Social Science (CASS Law Institute) held its sixth Rule of Law Forum in Beijing from November 3 to November 5 2016. The theme of this year’s forum is Legal Reform and Rule of Law: a Comparative Perspective. Speakers invited to the forum consist of scholars and judges from China, Japan, South Korea, Australia, Mexico, Brazil, Canada, Finland, Italy, Hungary, Poland, Germany and Russia. In addition to the opening and closing ceremony, there were 5 panels sessions and 25 talks in total. Topics discussed at the forum focused on the legal reform, legal culture and legal history of different countries. Speakers shared their views and experience on the issues related to the development of legal system in their home countries. Director of the Finnish China Law Center, professor Ulla Liukkunen was invited to speak at the forum.

The forum started with speeches given by prominent Chinese scholars and international scholars. Professor Zhang Wenxian, renowned scholar of Chinese civil law and vice chairman of the China Law Society opened the forum with a speech on the rule of law development in China. Professor César Landa, Universidad  Católica Del  Perú from Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú and professor Ulla Liukkunen discussed in their speeches why the rule of law experience in China is relevant to the rest of the world and growing emphasis on comparative law scholarship, respectively. Professor Li Lin, Director of the CASS Law Institute ended the opening ceremony with a speech on recent development of legal reform in China and the growing interest of comparative legal research among Chinese legal scholars and law-makers.

Following the opening ceremony, the forum held five individual panel sessions. During the closing ceremony, professor Simon Evans, professor Tomaz Giaro and professor Mo Jihong gave closing remarks on the importance of comparative legal research and the expansion of CASS law institute’s cooperation with foreign China law research centers.

 

 

By Dr. Zhang Yihong

CASS wants to strengthen its cooperation with the China Law Center

Professor Ulla Liukkunen, Director of the China Law Center and Professor Li Lin, Director of CASS, Institute of Law

Director of the China Law Center, Professor Ulla Liukkunen discussed future bilateral collaboration with Director of the CASS Law Institute, Li Lin on 4 November 2016 at the CASS Institute of Law in Beijing. According to Li Lin, the Chinese Academy of Social Science has put high value on its collaboration with the Finnish partners and wants to strengthen its cooperation with the Finnish China Law Center. Director Li Lin confirmed the willingness of the CASS Law to deepen research collaboration between the CASS and Finnish China Law Center. During the discussion it was agreed that the next bilateral conference will be held in Finland in 2017.

Professor Nuotio attended the Annual Conference of the New Silk Road Law Schools Alliance

Dean Kimmo Nuotio attended the annual conference of the New Silk Road Law Schools Alliance at University of New South Wales in Sydney on 4-5 November 2016. The Faculty of Law, University of Helsinki is one of the founding members of the Alliance. Deans and representatives of faculties and law schools of more than 10 Universities from 5 different continents attended the conference. During the discussions, the representatives planned future activities and considered new forms of academic collaboration and student mobility. The meeting was also an opportunity to report on the success of the international conference “Road to New Paradigms: Impact of China’s Silk Road Initiative in China, Central Asia and the EU” held earlier this year in Helsinki, and introduce the publication project following from this event. Dean Nuotio was accompanied by Kangle Zhang, contact person of the Alliance at the University of Helsinki.

The next annual meeting and workshop will take place at Wuhan University in China.

At the occasion of his visit to Australia, Dean Kimmo Nuotio also attended meetings at the law schools of Melbourne University, Australian National University and Sydney University to discuss future collaboration.

kimmosilkroadlawschoolaliiancenov2016

The Faculty of Law at the University of Helsinki will host the 6th China –Europe Legal Forum in 2018

juha-raitio-at-cupl
Professor Juha Raitio at CUPL

Professor Juha Raitio visited Beijing on 15-16 October 2016 and participated in the Fourth China-Europe Legal Forum as a representative of the University of Helsinki. The organizer of the event was the College of Comparative Law at the China University of Political Science and Law (CUPL). The team of this year Forum was “The Legal Cooperation in Risk Prevention Mechanism for ‘Belt and Road’ Initiative”.

The Forum has been also to mark a new stage in the legal exchange and cooperation between China and Europe by launching the China-Europe Legal Research Center and China-Europe Legal Training Base. Professor Raitio became one of the Guest Research Fellows of the newly founded China-Europe Research Center. This is just a token of our close connections to the legal education and research  in Beijing.

The next edition of this yearly event will be held by China Law Society and Society of Comparative Legislation in Paris in the fall of 2017. Already now, we are honored to announce that the 6th China –Europe Legal Forum will be held in Helsinki at the Law Faculty, University of Helsinki in 2018.

In 2013, China Law Society initiated the China–Europe Legal Forum. The Forum aims at promoting the exchange and cooperation in the field of law and economy between China and Europe, strengthening the understanding and communication between Chinese and European legal professionals, providing legal safeguard and service for the cooperation in the fields of investment, trade and environment protection, etc. The Forum plays a positive role in improving the development of comprehensive strategic partnership of China and Europe.

 

4th-china-europe-legal-forum
4th China-Europe Legal Forum

 

juha-raitio-at-pku
Professor Juha Raitio giving a lecture at PKU Law School

At the occasion of this visit to Beijing, Professor Raitio visited the Peking University Law School and gave a lecture on “The Principles of Legal Certainty and the Rule of Law”. This lecture is the latest manifestation of the growing cooperation within the PKU-Helsinki Law Connection framework. This partnership between Peking University Law School and the Faculty of Law at the University of Helsinki aims to consolidate and make more visible the already existing and fruitful co-operation as well as to develop new forms of collaboration for the mutual benefit. The goal is to make the existing forms of co-operation, lecture series, joint-seminars, joint publications and staff mobility, a part of the permanent structure of both institutions.

 

 

juha-raitio-in-beijing
Law Student Chen Dewen acted as a guide in the Purple Forbidden City in the old center of the Beijing.

International cooperation between legal scholars cannot be developed in conference rooms only and one needs to familiarize himself with the broader historical, cultural and societal context. Therefore, Professor Raitio has also took the time to visit Beijing’s landmarks and taste traditional local food.

 

 

Opportunities:

Papers, publications, conferences:

Positions:

Funding:

 

some-opportunities-only-come-once

 

Book Launch in China: “Implementing Fundamental Labour Rights in China: Legal Architecture and Cultural Logic”

mmexport1473857197053Peking University Law School held a seminar on “Fundamental Labour Rights and the Development of Chinese Labour Law” in conjunction with the book launch of Fundamental Labour Rights in China: Legal Implementation and Cultural Logic (eds. Ulla Liukkunen and Chen Yifeng, Springer, 2016) on 4 September 2016. The event was organized jointly by the Institute of Labour Law and Social Security, and the Institute of International Law, Peking University.

The event was openned by Professor Zhang Shouwen, Dean of the Peking University Law School, Tim de Meyer, Director of the Beijing Office of the International Labour Organization, and Jia Junling, professor at the Peking University Law and former chairperson of the Chinese Society of Social Law.

Professor Zhang, Professor Ye, Professor
Professor Zhang Shouwen, Professor Ye Jingyi, Professor Li Jiafei

Prof. Zhang acknowledged the book as an important example of the constructive collaboration between the Faculty of Law at Helsinki University and Peking University Law School. He further applauded the book as an achievement of the collaboration between labour law and

mmexport1473857161817
Professor Jia Junling

international law scholars and expressed his support to strengthening interdisciplinary research. Dean Zhang pointed out that the subject of the seminar revealed the importance of safeguarding the fundamental labour rights in the New Norm of Chinese economy. Mr. de Meyer congratulated the publication of this new book. He also offered insights on the process and challenges in the implementation of core labour standards in China, before updating the audience with the latest development of labour legislation at the ILO. Professor Jia emphasized that the development of Chinese labour law needs to pay close attention to ILO and international labour legislation.

Following the opening remarks, some of the contributors to the book, including Professor Ye Jingyi, Professor Xue Ninglan, Professor Xie Zengyi, Associate Professor Yan Dong and Associate Professor Chen Yifeng shared their thoughts with the audience.

In the part of seminar discussion, Professor Chang Kai of School of Labour and Human Resources, Renmin University and Dr. Chen Yifeng made presentations respectively on “Fundamental Labour Rights and Chinese Labour Law Studies” and “The Historical Origin of Fundamental Labour Rights”. The presentations were commented by Professor Zheng Shangyuan from Tsinghua University, Li Jiafei from Renmin University, Dr. Jiang Junlu, partner of Kingandwood Mallesons, and Professor Lin Yanling from Chinese Institute of Labour Relations. The eve nt ended with closing remarks by Professor Ye Jingyi and Professor Xie Zengyi.

 

mmexport1473857219207
Tim de Meyer, Director of the Beijing Office of the International Labour Organization
mmexport1473857173834
Professor Zheng Shangyuan
mmexport1473857206591
Assistant Professor Chen Yifeng
mmexport1473857194112
Professor Xue Ninglan

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The event has attracted more than 20 labour law scholars from Peking University Law School, Renmin University Law School, Renmin University School of Labour and Human Resources, Tsinghua University Law School, Institute of Law of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, China Institute of Industrial Relations, China Youth University of Political Studies School of Law, Beijing Foreign Studies University Law School, Central University of Finance and Economics Law School, Capital University of Economics and Business Law School, etc. The event was sponsored by the Project “International Labour Legislation and the Development of Chinese Labour Law” funded by National Planning Office of Philosophy and Social Science, China.

 

 

mmexport1473857237880

 

Center’s Coordinator visited the Oxford China Centre

Center’s Coordinator, Alice Neffe

The Center’s Coordinator, Ms. Alice Neffe, attended the Europaeum Summer School “China and Europe: Challenges for the Future?” hosted at the China Centre, University of Oxford.

The six day program has been filled with panel discussions by distinguished scholars and graduate presentations, all of which brought Chinese and European insights on the topical challenges faced by our contemporary societies. At heart of the discussions were crises of legitimacy, corruption, aging population, urbanization and the relation in a multi-polar world. In addition, the participants staged a simulation of a diplomatic negotiation regarding a hypothetical Chinese infrastructural investment in Europe. Beyond the academic discussions, the participants enjoyed Chinese culture while watching the well-known Cao Fei’s Haze and Fog, listening to readings of her novels by Ms Xiaolu Guo and of course eating some excellent Chinese food.

Both China and Europe are already today concerned with the future challenges. Yet, event if many scholars and politicians work effortlessly to find solutions, the future will be build by today’s young scholars. Therefore, through this event, Europaeum, once again, fulfilled its purpose to “serve as an ‘international university without walls’, in which future scholars and leaders of our new Europe will have an opportunity to share common learning and confront common concerns together“. This year, however, because many of the challenges have not only a European but a global dimension, Europaeum invited to its Summer School young scholars from mainland China (Renmin University, Fudan University) and Hong Kong.

Moreover, this event has been an opportunity for Ms. Neffe, our Center’s Coordinator, to have a first visit at the New Oxford China Center and take contact with the British scholars.