The open science annual review picks up the main topics in 2020: from Plan S to coronavirus pandemic

The open science review 2020 includes the refinements of Plan S and the tool for checking the Plan S compatibility of publishing channels, it provides a look at the guidelines and recommendations made in national open science coordination, and it provides an overview of the effects of the coronavirus pandemic on the openness of scientific information. The special theme is open access journals that vanish from the web – and the researcher’s means of preserving her or his own research.

Jatka lukemista ”The open science annual review picks up the main topics in 2020: from Plan S to coronavirus pandemic”

How and why I self-archive – four researchers report their views

Many reasons are given for self-archiving, and self-archivers follow many different practices. We asked four researchers from different disciplines how and why they self-archive their research results. We also asked the researchers about their views on the promotion of self-archiving. This is the seventh part of the Think Open blog’s article series on self-archiving.

Jatka lukemista ”How and why I self-archive – four researchers report their views”

Open science and qualitative research evaluation

”Responsible research evaluation must look past abstract quantitative indicators and examine research in its true context, which requires qualitative research evaluation approaches and methods.” In this blog article, Joona Lehtomäki, a science adviser at the division of strategic research at the Academy of Finland (Research Councils Finland), writes about research evaluation, role of metrics, impact of research, open science and the qualitative turn in research evaluation. Lehtomäki also outlines what would a turn towards more contextualized and qualitative research evaluation mean in practice.

Jatka lukemista ”Open science and qualitative research evaluation”

Better visibility, more impact – and six other advantages of self-archiving

Self-archiving has many kinds of advantages, such as being free of charge and increasing visibility and effectiveness. This article briefly describes the most important advantages of self-archiving. This is the fourth part of Think Open blog’s article series on self-archiving.  [This article was updated in December 8, 2021.]

Jatka lukemista ”Better visibility, more impact – and six other advantages of self-archiving”

What are the benefits of UH Data Support’s DMP services? Four researchers share their views

For many researchers, the the Academy of Finland’s September 2019 Call makes data management planning a topical issue. The University of Helsinki Data Support provides support for the preparation of data management plans (DMP). We asked four UH researchers how well the Data Support services responded to their needs.

Jatka lukemista ”What are the benefits of UH Data Support’s DMP services? Four researchers share their views”

New publishing channel for blog articles – Think Open Digest helps researchers find the blog content better

Think Open Digest journal combines and regroupes articles published on the blog into thematic entities. The first two issues are dedicated to research data management, a current topic due to the Academy of Finland’s September 2019 call.

Jatka lukemista ”New publishing channel for blog articles – Think Open Digest helps researchers find the blog content better”

How to promote openness? Paula Eerola and Tuuli Toivonen discuss scientific publishing and research data

Vice rector Paula Eerola and associate professor of geoinformatics Tuuli Toivonen discuss the Plan S declaration, open access incentives, research-data issues, data management and corporate collaboration. This is the abstract of the original posts, part 1 and part 2 (in Finnish).

Jatka lukemista ”How to promote openness? Paula Eerola and Tuuli Toivonen discuss scientific publishing and research data”